<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hypothesis for DNA Fingerprinting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifemapdna.com/hypothesis-for-dna-fingerprinting.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifemapdna.com/hypothesis-for-dna-fingerprinting.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noodles Romanov</title>
		<link>http://www.lifemapdna.com/hypothesis-for-dna-fingerprinting.html/comment-page-1#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Noodles Romanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifemapdna.com/hypothesis-for-dna-fingerprinting.html#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>Hypothesis:  My DNA fingerprinting technique creates a signature of an individual that&#039;s unique enough that given 100 individuals&#039; DNA, I&#039;d be able to identify only the individual whose DNA was given 99.9% of the time; it would identify one or more incorrect individuals 0.001% of the time; and that it would identify no individual 100.0 - 99.9 - .001 = .0999% of the time.

Something like that.

By the way, when you&#039;re asking for help, it might be better to be a little more polite, instead of threatening answerers with deletion.  Don&#039;t threaten, just do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypothesis:  My DNA fingerprinting technique creates a signature of an individual that&#8217;s unique enough that given 100 individuals&#8217; DNA, I&#8217;d be able to identify only the individual whose DNA was given 99.9% of the time; it would identify one or more incorrect individuals 0.001% of the time; and that it would identify no individual 100.0 &#8211; 99.9 &#8211; .001 = .0999% of the time.</p>
<p>Something like that.</p>
<p>By the way, when you&#8217;re asking for help, it might be better to be a little more polite, instead of threatening answerers with deletion.  Don&#8217;t threaten, just do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

