should DNA fingerprinting be used as evidence in the courtroom?

4 Responses to “should DNA fingerprinting be used as evidence in the courtroom?”

  1. Ryan Says:

    wtf….of course

    every fingerprint is unique to that person

  2. ???????? Says:

    That’s a very good piece of information and evidence. If you can get a hold of it, by all means use it if you can.

  3. Robert B Says:

    Yes. Although all forms of evidence can be tampered with, contaminated, or give misleading results, DNA evidence is one of the most reliable forms of evidence there is — much better than eyewitness testimony, for example.

  4. Paul Says:

    Yes, it has been used as evidence in criminal proceedings since 1985.

Leave a Reply